Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kailash Dayanand Punjabi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kailash Dayanand Punjabi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Journal Entries ≠ Undisclosed Income- ITAT Gives Fresh Life to ₹51 Lakh Additions The Pune ITAT granted relief to a poultry farm owner by holding that additions merely arising from journal entries, reclassification of investments, or old property advances require proper verification before being taxed as unexplained income. The Tribunal restored the matter back to the AO after admitting crucial additional evidence. The assessee was subjected to additions of ₹5 lakh u/s 68 and ₹45.98 lakh u/s 69. The AO treated a long-pending property advance ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930