Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Periyasamy Karthikeyan Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Periyasamy Karthikeyan Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court) ITC claimed under wrong head does not amount to excess claim, as long same is available to claim-Madras HC. In recent case of Periyasamy Karthikeyan vs The State Tax Officer, Karur MADRAS HIGH COURT held that, mere claim of ITC under head of CGST and SGST instead of IGST, does not amount to excess claim, unless same claimed without any ITC actually available. Court set aside the order. Background:- the petitioner has wrongly claimed ITC for the financial year 2018-19, under CGST and SGST instead of claiming it under the head IGST,...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Santosh Dhumal, Practicing Chartered accountant In Navi Mumbai. over 9 years of extensive experience in GST audits, consulting, and advisory. He is renowned for his insightful analysis of GST provisions, procedural compliance, and recent legal updates, regularly contributing to TaxGuru and other View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No GST on Corporate Guarantee Without Consideration: Bombay HC CBIC issued FAQs on IGST Refund Intermediary Services -Litigation Hotspot under GST and way ahead GST Place of Supply Change for Intermediary Services from 30 March 2026  Madras HC Set Aside GST Assessment Order for Ignoring Taxpayer Reply View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031