Sponsored
    Follow Us:
  2. Filter Judiciary

Filter Judiciary

Reset
Found 22504 Results

Loss of one industrial undertaking cannot be set off against the profit of another such industrial undertaking for purpose of computing deduction u/s 80-I

Case Name : CIT Vs Sona Koyo Steering Systems Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 1279/2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 10/02/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Delhi High Court (3377)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Bad Debts: Debtor’s A/c need not be written off: Supreme Court

Case Name : Vijaya Bank Vs. CIT (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (2373)

If a Municipality is not notified by the Central Government, the agricultural land falling therein cannot be treated as capital asset by taking the distance from the limits of other Municipality

Case Name : Srinivas Pandit (HUF) Vs. ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No: ITA No. 56/HYD/2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/04/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2003- 04
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Hyderabad (630)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Section 80HH to section 80U under chapter VI-A are not independent and shall be governed by the provisions of section 80A read with section 80B(5) of the Act

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax- II Vs M/s Arif Industries Ltd. (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Income Tax Appeal No. 34 of 2003
Date of Judgement/Order : 12/03/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Allahabad High Court (800)

Proper drafting of agreements necessary to avoid unnecessary litigation & tax liabilities

Case Name : In re GMP International GMBH (Authority For Advance Ruling)
Appeal Number : (AAR No. 837/2009)
Date of Judgement/Order : 29/01/2010
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Advance Rulings (3746)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Penalty- sec. 271(1)(c ) – when two views are possible penalty cannot be imposed

Case Name : Ito Vs Mahavir Cycle Industries (ITAT Chandigarh)
Appeal Number : 24/09/2009
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Chandigarh (315)

ITAT should dispose off stay granted appeals within the period specified under section 254(2A): Bombay HC

Case Name : Shri Jethmal Faujimal Soni Vs. ITAT (Bombay High Court)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All High Courts (13958) Bombay High Court (1883)

Special Bench chosen not to follow the Karnataka High Court’s judgement in the case of Samsung Electronics

Case Name : ITO Vs Prasad Production Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : (ITA No. 663/Mds/2003
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) Madras High Court (1763)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

S. 195 (1) TDS obligation does not arise if the payment is not chargeable to tax. Samsung Electronics not followed

Case Name : ITO Vs M/s Prasad Production (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number :
Date of Judgement/Order :
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Chennai (858)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Obligation to withhold tax attracted only when the payment to a non-resident is wholly or partially chargeable to tax in India

Case Name : ITO Vs M/s Prasad Production
Appeal Number : (ITAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order : ITA No. 663/Mds/2003
Related Assessment Year : 09/04/2010
Courts : All ITAT (14957) ITAT Chennai (858)
Become a Member to Download If you are already a member, Login here to access

Latest Posts

View All Posts
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031