Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs M/s Prasad Production (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs M/s Prasad Production (ITAT Chennai Special Bench) The assessee made a remittance to IMAX Canada towards technology transfer fee without deduction of tax at source. The AO took the view that the consideration was “fees for technical services” u/s 9 (1)(vii) and that tax ought to have been deducted at source as per Transmission Corporation 239 ITR 587 (SC). He accordingly held the assessee to be an “assessee-in-default” u/s 201 though the CIT(A) reversed the same. On appeal by the revenue, the question as to whether a person responsible for making payment to a non-resident was li...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. veena says:

    I recieve Rs.20,000 rent per month. after 30 % deduction, the net amount chargable to tax is Rs.168000 per annum which is below the taxable limit. should TDS be deducted

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930