Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Jethmal Faujimal Soni Vs. ITAT (Bombay High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

Shri Jethmal Faujimal Soni Vs. ITAT (Bombay High Court)

S. 254 (2A) empowers the Tribunal to grant stay of recovery of demand for a period not exceeding 365 days. The 3rd Proviso to s. 254(2A) inserted by the Finance Act 2008 provides that if there is a delay in disposing of the appeal within the said period, the order of stay shall stand vacated even if the delay in disposing of the appeal is not attributable to the assessee.

The assessee’s appeal was adjourned by the Tribun

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Tira.T says:

    How many ITAT members (including its President) are going to heed to this judgment? Who does not know that the ITAT has its own way of (mal)functioning, and if one does not play to its tunes, one must suffer-be it the Tax deptt. or the tax payer!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31