Follow Us:

ITAT Rajkot

Usance interest for delayed payment to holding company liable to TDS

September 28, 2018 4200 Views 0 comment Print

Usance interest paid for the delayed payment to its holding company was not any part of purchase price of goods and was interest within the definition of term ‘interest’ under section 2(28A), therefore, assessee was liable to withhold tax under section 195 from said payment.

Commission to Sahayak for collecting milk liable for TDS u/s 194C

March 23, 2018 4791 Views 0 comment Print

Commission payments made by assessee to Sahayak was on percentage basis depending on various parameters like number of farmers pouring milk, fat and SNF factor in milk, quantity of milk collected etc. which ensured payment was commensurate with work performed and thus, the nature of work carried out by the Sahayak were covered by provisions of section 194C instead of section 194H and accordingly tax was deducted on the same accordingly. 

Addition merely on the basis of rough papers found from premises of wife of assesse not sustainable

March 4, 2018 3795 Views 0 comment Print

Rajkot bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that the notebooks and diaries found from assessee’s wife cannot be treated as Books of Accounts for the purpose of making addition under the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Income on Agricultural land sale cannot be treated as business gain merely for higher volume of sale consideration

December 26, 2017 3150 Views 1 comment Print

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Rajkot bench, while allowing the assessees’ appeal, held that the sale of land cannot be treated as business activity for the purpose of levying income tax even though there is a higher volume of sale consideration.

GP on unaccounted Sales cannot be less than that of Accounted Sales

March 3, 2017 4989 Views 0 comment Print

We note that GP rate on the accounted sales estimated by the assessee himself stands at 07.29%. We thus fail to understand as to how the GP for the unaccounted sale should be so lower at 03.56% which is less than half of the GP rate declared by the assessee himself on accounted sales.

No disallowance for Non deduction of TDS on amount paid to Tata Group Companies

March 2, 2017 6789 Views 0 comment Print

In the present appeal, the assessee is aggrieved by the action of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-Jamnagar [CIT(A)- in short] in confirming the addition of Rs.3,25,528/- made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under s.40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

Swift Dzire classifiable as LMV & eligible for additional depreciation

October 13, 2016 8257 Views 0 comment Print

In the present case, the ld.AO has granted depreciation at the rate of 15% without examining relevant provisions. It appears that his finding is based upon his experience and past impression. He was of the opinion that once Board has not granted higher rate of depreciation to cars, which are put in the business of hiring, or in public transportation, then how a partner, who used motor car for the purpose of business can be granted at a such rate.

Benefits under Indo-Singapore tax treaty cannot be denied where such income have taxed on accrual basis in treaty country

November 1, 2015 1922 Views 0 comment Print

ITAT Rajkot held In the case of GAC Shipping India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO – International Taxation that entire freight income of the assessee, which is only from operation of ships in international traffic, is taxable only in Singapore.

If intention for trade in share is earning quick Profit by frequent trading, such profit taxable as business income

April 1, 2013 717 Views 0 comment Print

Intention of the assessee was to turn over the stock as frequently as possible to ensure quick realization of profits on sale of shares. In the Tax Audit Report, the nature of the business of the assessee has been shown as trading of shares. The tax auditor has come to the aforesaid conclusion after due examination of the books of account.

Amendment to sec. 40(a)(ia) vide Finance Act, 2010 was retrospective in nature

March 4, 2013 926 Views 0 comment Print

Bare perusal of the scheme of Chapter XVII-B shows that it mandates the person responsible for paying any sum out of which tax is required to be deducted at source to deduct the requisite amount of tax at source out of the amounts paid/credited by him. Deduction of tax is made out of the amounts paid/credited by the person responsible for paying/crediting the same.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031