On Dutt S/o Shri Bal Krishan Vs ACST&E-cum-Proper Officer (GST Appellate Authority, Himachal Pradesh) It appears that there is no dispute regarding quantity of goods and further all concerns documents were placed before the proper officer. It is a fact that The E Way bill for the goods in question was generated at 09:43 pm […]
In Re Om Dutt S/O Shri Bal Krishan (GST Appellate Authority Himachal Pradesh) It appears that there is no dispute regarding quantity of goods and further all concerns documents were placed before the proper officer. It is a fact that The E Way bill for the goods in question was generated at 09:43 pm on […]
Neva plantation Private Limited Vs ACST&E (GST Appellate Authority, Himachal Pradesh) It appears that there is no dispute regarding quantity/quality of goods and further it has been clearly mentioned on the challan that the goods are not for sale only for repair. Since the transaction has no tax implications, the proper office while adjudicating the […]
Bhushan Power & Steel Limited Vs Asst. Commissioner State Taxes & Excise (GST Appellate Authority Himachal Pradesh) Rule 138(10) says that validity of e-way bill may be extended within 8 hours from the time of its expiry but in the instant cases the vehicle was practically apprehended in almost 08 to 09 hours of the […]
Godrej Consumer Products Ltd. Vs ACST&E (GST Appellate Authority, Himachal Pradesh) It is revealed that due to a typographic error while generating E-way bill, the petitioner mentioned approx distance between Puducherry to Himachal Pradesh as 20 Kilometers instead of 2000 Kilometers. As a result, a validity of one day has been calculated by the E-way […]
K.B Enterprises Vs Assistant Commissioner (GST Appellate Authority, Himachal Pradesh) In the view of above discussions I am of considerate opinion that the penalty imposed in the instant case under section 129 was unwarranted. GST Council vide circular No 64/38/2018 dated 14th September, 2018 and the HP circular no. 12-25/2018-19-EXN-GST-(575)-6009-6026 dtd 13th March 2019 valid […]
Uttarakhand GST Appellate authority set aside penalty order under section 129 for clerical error in e way bill. In the E way bill Inward supply was selected instead of outward supply. Joint Commissioner (Appeal), State Tax, Rudrapur, in light of Circular No.- 64/38/2018; Dated 14-09-2018, quashed the order of Assitant commissioner demanding integrated tax and Penalty of Rs 1,29,915 each under section 129 and instead levied a general penalty of Rs 1,000/- on the Appellant.
