Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DGAP Vs Urban Essence (Subway Franchisee) (GSTAT)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DGAP Vs Urban Essence (Subway Franchisee) (GSTAT) GSTAT Upholds Anti-Profiteering Ruling Against Subway Franchisee for Failure to Pass on GST Rate Reduction In a significant ruling, the Principal Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has confirmed that M/s Urban Essence, a franchisee of Subway, engaged in profiteering by not reducing its product prices commensurately with a reduction in the GST rate. The tribunal found that the company had a profiteering amount of ₹5,47,005 that must be deposited. The case, DGAP vs. Urban Essence, centered on two primary questions: w...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930