Competition Commission of India

CCI dismisses Plea Alleging Dominant Position abuse by Whatsapp & Facebook

Harshita Chawla Vs. WhatsApp Inc. & Facebook Inc. (Competition Commission of India)01/01/1970

Harshita Chawla Vs. WhatsApp Inc. & Facebook Inc. (Competition Commission of India) As regards the allegation of leveraging, the Commission does not agree with the Informant for reasons cited supra while dealing with the allegation under Section 4(2)(d) of the Act. The Informant has contended that WhatsApp will leverage its dominance ...

Read More

CCI closes complaint against West Bengal lotteries directorate, stockist

XYZ Vs Directorate of State Lotteries (Competition Commission of India)01/01/1970

XYZ Vs Directorate of State Lotteries (Competition Commission of India) Competition Commission has closed a complaint alleging unfair business practices by the Directorate of State Lotteries, West Bengal, and West Bengal Lottery Stockists Syndicate. Full Text of the order of Competition Commission of India 1. The present Information has b...

Read More

CCI orders Anti-Trust Probe against Amazon/ Flipkart on 4 Issues

Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh Vs. Flipkart Internet Private Limited and its affiliated entities (Competition Commission of India)01/01/1970

On careful perusal of allegations levelled by the Informant and the documents provided, the Commission notes that there are four alleged practices on the marketplaces, namely, exclusive launch of mobile phones, preferred sellers on the marketplaces, deep discounting and preferential listing/promotion of private labels....

Read More

Presumptive inference provided by Informant cannot be basis for forming a prima facie opinion

Ravi Pal Vs All India Sugar Trade Association (AISTA) (CCI)01/01/1970

Ravi Pal Vs All India Sugar Trade Association (AISTA) (CCI) After appreciation of the allegations of the Informant and documents submitted including the oral submissions made by the Informant, the Commission is of the view that no evidence has been provided by the Informant to show that there was any meeting of minds between the […...

Read More

Motive Irrelevant In determining Abuse Of Dominance: CCI

Velankani Electronics Private Limited Vs Intel Corporation (Competition Commission of India)01/01/1970

Velankani Electronics Private Limited Vs Intel Corporation (Competition commission of India) The OP has also argued that it has no incentive to deny access to anyone to the Server or Server-Board market segment. The OP’s interests are aligned to ensure multiple manufacturers of Server-Boards and Servers. Since the OP’s primary focus i...

Read More

Rounding Off Railway Fares Prima Facie Abuse of Dominance: CCI

Mr. Meet Shah Vs Union of India, Ministry of Railway (Competition Commissioner of India)01/01/1970

Mr. Meet Shah Vs Union of India, Ministry of Railway (Competition Commissioner of India) Railway and IRCTC (Opposite Parties) have not been able to convince the Commission as to why the policy of rounding off of actual base fares to the next higher multiple of Rs.5 is applicable to the sale of online tickets, when […]...

Read More

CCI imposes penalty upon Esaote for abusing dominant position

House of Diagnostics LLP Vs. Esaote S.p.A & other (Competition Commission of India)01/01/1970

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has imposed a penalty of Rs. 9.33 lac upon Esaote S.p.A and Esaote Asia Pacific Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd. (‘Esaote’) for abusing dominant position in supplying dedicated standing/ tilting MRI machines....

Read More

CCI imposes penalties on Sugar Mills & their Associations for rigging bids

CCI imposes penalties on Sugar Mills & Associations for rigging bids01/01/1970

CCI imposes penalties upon Sugar Mills and their Associations for rigging the bids in respect of Joint Tender floated by Oil Marketing Companies for procurement of Ethanol for blending with Petrol ...

Read More

CCI order regarding cartelisation in Indian Zinc-Carbon Dry Cell Batteries Market 

Re. Panasonic Corporation, Japan & Others (Competition Commission of India)01/01/1970

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) passed a final order imposing penalty on Panasonic Energy India Co. Limited Panasonic) and Geep Industries (India) Private Limited (Geep) for colluding to fix prices of zinc-carbon dry cell batteries in India. In respect of Panasonic, CCI granted 100 percent reduction in penalty by invoking the pr...

Read More

CCI penalises All India Chess Federation for abuse of dominant position

Hemant Sharma & Others Vs. All India Chess Federation (Competition Commission of India)01/01/1970

CCI issues order against All India Chess Federation for abuse of dominant position and imposition of unreasonable vertical restraints on chess players and organisation of chess events; Imposes penalty of Rs. 6.92 lakhs on AICF for the Anti-Competitive conduct....

Read More

Browse All Categories

CA, CS, CMA (5,334)
Company Law (7,084)
Custom Duty (8,390)
DGFT (4,505)
Excise Duty (4,467)
Fema / RBI (4,612)
Finance (4,876)
Income Tax (36,511)
SEBI (3,894)
Service Tax (3,694)

Search Posts by Date

April 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930