ITAT Bangalore held that non-registration of will doesn’t lead to any inference against its genuineness. Thus, jewellery inherited from mother in law based on non-registered will be capital assets and sell thereof results into long term capital gain.
Regional Oilseeds Growers Co-operative Societies Union Ltd. vs JCIT: ITAT upholds jurisdiction limitation, dismissing appeal regarding assessing authority’s jurisdiction challenge under Income Tax Act.
Read the ITAT Bangalore order in the case of Space Employees Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. vs. ITO. Learn about delay condonation & Section 80P(2)(d) relief for ISRO Employees Society.
Bangalore ITAT remits the case back to the AO for fresh consideration, citing enhancement made to taxpayer’s income without following procedures under Sec 154.
Read about Rajesh Laxmikanth Varnerkar Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) case where the assessee couldn’t reach the tax consultant due to business dislocation, leading to a remand order under section 250 of the Income Tax Act.
Read the full text of the ITAT Bangalore order on Aijaz Ahmed Suri Vs ITO regarding demonetization deposits. Analysis and conclusion included.
TDS was not to be deducted on payments to Manthan Systems Inc. (MSI) for sales commission under section 40(a)(i) as services rendered to assessee by the said Manthan Systems Inc. was not falling within the ambit of FTS or under Article 12 of the treaty, assessee was not liable to deduct TDS on the payment made to the MSI.
ITAT Bangalore held that payment made by Google India Pvt. Ltd. to Google Ireland Limited (assessee) for sale of online advertisement space is not taxable in India as the same cannot be regarded as royalty or FTS.
In the case of SVT Wholesale Pvt. Ltd. Vs JCIT, the ITAT Bangalore evaluates the penalty imposed under Section 271D for violating Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Learn about the legal arguments, precedents, and the tribunal’s decision.
Raveendra M. Madrak Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore): Taxpayer’s appeal delay condonation plea rejected due to lack of proof on CA’s advice and negligence. Full text here.
