Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Heggur Nanjundappa Vishwanath Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Heggur Nanjundappa Vishwanath Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

In the case of Heggur Nanjundappa Vishwanath Vs The Income Tax Officer, Circle – 7(1)(1), Bengaluru, ITAT Bangalore sets aside CIT(A) ex-parte order on the grounds that assessee was not given a fair chance of being heard during the appellate proceedings before CIT(A). The assessee had made specific request in Form-35 that communication should not be made through mail. Assessee submitted that he is a senior citizen, is not tech-savvy and was unaware about the notices sent to his email. Despite the spec

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Addition u/s 153A without incriminating material found during search – Statements of third parties not sufficient: ITAT Delhi Quantifying Escaped Income Mandatory at Reason-Recording Stage: ITAT Delhi Planning, HR, Legal & IT Support Not Taxable as FTS Under India-USA DTAA, Citing ‘Make Available’ Test Section 153D Approval Must Be Year-Specific, Independent & Non-Mechanical: Delhi ITAT ITAT Delhi allows lease equalization and business loss write-offs View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930