Bangalore ITAT restricted the s.69A unexplained cash addition for non-filer Umesh Babu to the peak credit of Rs.12.25 lakhs, rejecting the Rs.ｹ57.10 lakhs addition.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside the NFAC’s order against Puvvada Veera Kumar, finding that the CIT(A) failed to consider detailed written submissions uploaded to the portal, necessitating a de novo appeal hearing.
Bangalore ITAT set aside PCIT’s s.263 order, ruling that difference of opinion on profit estimation rate (6% vs 8%) for a contractor isn’t grounds for revision.
ITAT Bangalore ruled that income belongs to the person who actually earned it. Purchases and sales recorded by son, with audited accounts, barred addition in father’s hands.
The ITAT Bangalore allowed appeals by Mohammad Abdul Najeeb and others, ruling that the non-communication of reasons and lack of hearing opportunity before issuing a Section 127 jurisdiction transfer order rendered the subsequent search assessments
Bangalore ITAT rejected PR consultant’s revised return, ruling that agency business is excluded from presumptive taxation under s.44AD(6)(iii). Original income confirmed.
CIT(A)/NFAC had dismissed appeal alleging no submissions; ITAT noted documents were filed and directed fresh consideration, upholding principles of natural justice.
Technicalities Cannot Defeat Substantial Justice: ITAT Allows Delayed Appeal of Rural Senior Citizen- Email Notices Ignored by 74-Year-Old HUF Kartha – ITAT Bangalore Grants Relief & Restores Matter to NFAC
The ITAT Bangalore has condoned a 126-day delay for a senior citizen, remanding her property transaction case to the AO after finding she was unaware of proceedings due to her son’s death.
The ITAT Bangalore bench held that the objects of Shrthiparampara Gurukulam, a trust teaching Vedas, are charitable and not religious. This ruling allows the trust to claim tax exemptions under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, reversing the CIT(E)’s decision which had categorized the trust as religious and ineligible for approval.
