Taxpayer Fails to Prove CA’s Advice: ITAT Denies Appeal Delay Condonation

Raveendra M. Madrak Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

The case of Raveendra M. Madrak vs. ITO (ITAT Bangalore) revolves around the condonation of a 310-day delay in filing an appeal. Despite the taxpayer’s claim of reliance on professional advice, the ITAT ruled against condoning the delay. This article provides a detailed analysis of the case and its implications.

 The taxpayer sought condonation of a 310-day delay in filing an appeal, citing advice from their Chartered Acco

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.