Case Law Details
Case Name : ACIT Vs Sharada Narayanan (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
ACIT Vs Sharada Narayanan (ITAT Bangalore)
ITAT Bangalore held that non-registration of will doesn’t lead to any inference against its genuineness. Thus, jewellery inherited from mother in law based on non-registered will be capital assets and sell thereof results into long term capital gain.
Facts- The assessee has claimed capital gains of Rs.6,29,20,349/- arising out of sale of jewellery of Rs.7,09,53,800/-. This capital gains is stated to be reinvested in purchase of
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Author Bio
This information is valuable for anyone dealing with inherited assets and looking to ensure compliance with income tax regulations. Keep up the great work in providing such informative content!