Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : G M Builders Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017–18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
G M Builders Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Assessee is a partnership firm who filed its return of income after 148 notice was issued. PCIT issued a notice after verification of the assessment records that the assessment was framed on the income declared in the return filed u/s 148. This implies that despite assessee’s income being greater than the maximum amount not chargeable to tax, he did not file the return of income and this return was furnished for the first time u/s 148. It was held that assessee has to be considered as a person who has under-reported its income u/s 270A(2)(b). However in the...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930