Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : G M Builders Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017–18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

G M Builders Vs PCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

Assessee is a partnership firm who filed its return of income after 148 notice was issued. PCIT issued a notice after verification of the assessment records that the assessment was framed on the income declared in the return filed u/s 148. This implies that despite assessee’s income being greater than the maximum amount not chargeable to tax, he did not file the return of income and this return was furnished for the first time u/s 148. It was held that assessee has to be considered as a person who has under-reported its income u/s 270A(2)(b). Ho

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

No Addition u/s 153A without incriminating material found during search – Statements of third parties not sufficient: ITAT Delhi Quantifying Escaped Income Mandatory at Reason-Recording Stage: ITAT Delhi Planning, HR, Legal & IT Support Not Taxable as FTS Under India-USA DTAA, Citing ‘Make Available’ Test Section 153D Approval Must Be Year-Specific, Independent & Non-Mechanical: Delhi ITAT ITAT Delhi allows lease equalization and business loss write-offs View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930