Tribunal invalidated the reassessment because the Assessing Officer failed to obtain mandatory approval from the specified authority under Section 151(ii), rendering the Section 148 notice void.
The reassessment notice under Section 148 issued after 01.04.2021 did not comply with the amended provisions requiring enquiry and hearing. The NFAC held the reassessment order void ab initio. This ruling emphasizes strict adherence to procedural safeguards under amended law.
The NFAC remitted a statutory authority’s taxability under Section 2(15) to the AO for fresh consideration. The assessee’s exemption claims under Sections 11 and 12 were disputed. The ruling ensures reassessment aligns with Supreme Court guidelines and provides a fair hearing.
ITAT Delhi deletes ₹38 lakh additions under Sections 68 and 69A, accepting that agricultural income was misreported due to a clerical error and demonetization cash was properly explained.
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, citing genuine non-receipt of the order by the assessee and restored the matter for reconsideration.
The ITAT restored a charitable trust’s registration issue to CIT(E) after allowing additional evidence, emphasizing proper verification of documents before rejecting applications.
Tribunal holds that reassessment proceedings under Sections 147/148 are invalid as the notice was issued beyond the extended due date, following Supreme Court guidance in Rajeev Bansal.
ITAT Delhi overturned the CIT(Exemption)’s rejection of 12AA registration, ruling that corpus grants should not be assessed at the registration stage but under section 11 exemption proceedings.
ITAT partly upheld addition of Rs.27.5 lakh as unexplained cash under sections 69A and 115BBE, granting limited relief of Rs.7.5 lakh for partial savings.
ITAT Pune reverses CIT(E) order, granting 80G approval to a trust, ruling that minor religious expenditures do not negate predominant charitable activities.
