Follow Us:

All ITAT

Trust Registration valid for sec. 25 Companies formed with charitable objects

January 24, 2013 2281 Views 0 comment Print

In the instant case, a perusal of the object clause of the company shows that it has been incorporated with the aim of providing education, facilitate social and economic empowerment, economic development programs, literacy programs, training programs for villagers and downtrodden people. How these objects are to be achieved should be left to the assessee. The fact that the assessee has been incorporated under section 25 of the Companies Act, 1956 show that it has been formed for promoting charity or any other useful object and intends to apply its profits, if any or other income in promoting its objects. In other words, it’s a non-profit earning organization.

Landmark ITAT Special Bench Verdict On Transfer Pricing Of advertisement, marketing & sales promotion expenses

January 24, 2013 2964 Views 0 comment Print

Transfer pricing adjustment in relation to advertisement, marketing and sales promotion expenses incurred by the assessee for creating or improving the marketing intangible for and on behalf of the foreign Associated Enterprises is permissible.

Depreciation on Building used by the Assessee allowable despite non registration in his name

January 24, 2013 3619 Views 0 comment Print

Having gone through the orders of the authorities below we find that the claim of the assessee that the building in question was purchased by it and was in use for the purpose of its business was not denied by the AO. The AO has disallowed the claimed depreciation only on the basis that the building was yet to be registered in the name of the assessee company.

Sec 50C Not Apply to Transfer of FSI & TDR

January 23, 2013 3976 Views 0 comment Print

In this case, the matter was not referred by the A.O. to the DVO. We, therefore, set aside the order of the Ld. CIT (A) and restore the issue of valuation to the file of the A.O. with the direction to refer the same to the DVO in the light of our above observations.

Warranty provisions made on scientific & Reasonable basis is allowable

January 23, 2013 2267 Views 0 comment Print

It is seen from the methodology that the assessee takes into account the warranty liability for the accounting period after bifurcating the likely cost on account of labour, material etc. The summary of the provision also shows that wherever excess provision was made in an earlier year, the same was reversed in the subsequent period.

S.194H TDS not deductible on charges for of utilization of credit card facilities

January 23, 2013 7469 Views 0 comment Print

Commission paid to the credit card companies cannot be considered as falling within the purview of S.194H. Even though the definition of the term commission or brokerage used in the said section is an inclusive definition, it is clear that the liability to make TDS under the said section arises only when a person acts behalf of another person.

Sec. 50C not applicable to transfer of shares or indirect transfer of immovable property through share transfer

January 23, 2013 3488 Views 0 comment Print

In the instant case, what transferred by the assessee are the shares in the company and not the land or building or both. Assessee does not have full ownership on the flats which are owned by the company. The transfer of shares was never a part of the assessment of the Stamp duty Authorities of the State Government.

Assessee must substantiate its claim that payment in cash were not in violation of section 40A(3)

January 22, 2013 1075 Views 0 comment Print

As regards the payments of Rs.20,000/- or more, the assessee has not substantiated his claim that the payments of Rs.20,000/- or more with regard to the purchases were made for Rs.20,000/- or less before the AO. It is also not on record whether such claim was actually made before the AO or not. With regard to the claim before the ld. CIT(A), all the vouchers are self made vouchers and without any authenticity of the name and complete address of the recipient. From the claim of the assessee before the ld. CIT(A), the payments are claimed to have been made on different hours on the same day and accordingly on different dates.

If ‘business income’ not taxable due to absence of PE in India, it cannot be taxed as ‘other income’

January 22, 2013 2706 Views 0 comment Print

If a certain receipt cannot be taxed under any other head, only then the sections dealing with ‘Income from Other Sources’, come into play in domestic taxation matters. Likewise, under the DTAAs, if a sum can be taxed under any other Article, provisions of Article 22 will not be applicable. We are of the opinion, in light of the earlier decisions of the Mumbai Tribunal income received by the assessee-company form McKinsey India is not to be treated as Royalty-rather it has to assessed as business income as per Article 7 of the DTAA.

No restriction in considering companies with either abnormal profits / losses as comparable to tested party, as long as they are functionally comparable

January 22, 2013 2263 Views 0 comment Print

As far as the provisions of the Act are concerned, they lay down that the comparable companies should be functionally comparable to the tested party. There are no specific standards of comparability on the basis of abnormal profits or loss. Rule 10B(2) provides that the comparability of an international transaction with an uncontrolled transaction shall be judged with reference to the following, namely:-

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930