‘IHC’ cannot be disintegrated from profit derived from shipping business as envisaged under Article -8 of India-UAE DTAA. Ergo, ‘IHC’ are not taxable as business profit in India.
Markand Induprasad Bhatt Vs DCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) However, we note that the power of rectification u/s 154 of the Act can be exercised only if there is a mistake apparent from the record which is one of the pre-condition meaning thereby the mistake should be apparent, obvious from the record. In other words, in order […]
Royal Rubber Works Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Undisputedly, the addition based on which the Assessing Officer imposed penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was on account of sundry creditors. While deciding the quantum appeal of the assessee, the Tribunal has deleted the major part of the addition, accepting assessee’s submission that such amount was […]
ITAT held that Reasonable time limit for issue of notice u/s 201(1)/201(1A) is 4 years and Assessee cannot be taxed for non-deduction of TDS U/s. 195 if non-resident discharged obligation with respect to payment of capital gains tax
ITAT Held that, since assessee ceased to be in existence as on the date when Ld. AO passed the impugned order of assessment, assessment so framed is not sustainable in the eye of law.
Closer of capital gain account without NOC of AO, the broad provisions and compliance of law surpass the mere default in not taking prior permission of ITO before closer of account
ITAT Held that replacement of parts of an existing machinery in the course of their working will be a revenue expenditure.
ITAT Held that addition on the basis of the opening balance of unsecured loan treating the same as current year transaction by invoking section 68 of the Income Tax Act is unsustainable.
ACIT Vs Rohit Bal Designs Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Ld. A.O has committed an error by passing assessment order based on standalone basis despite fact that he had full knowledge of amalgamation while making the addition. The Ld. A.O should have considered the effect of amalgamation more so in view of the specific mandate of […]
Held that payment made for usage of rights for the internet and telecom facility doesn’t fall in the nature of work defined u/s 194C and hence TDS not deductible.
