Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ramesh Chander Nijhawan Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ramesh Chander Nijhawan Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

The AO disallowed the deduction u/s 54F on the grounds that the capital gain account has been closed without the approval of the Assessing Officer and thus failed to satisfy the mandatory requirement of closing the account with due approval of the AO. The ld. CIT(A) concurred with the observation of the ld. CIT(A).

It is not in dispute that an amount of Rs.40,00,000/- has been invested in the specified bonds, in this case REC Bonds and purchased

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930