Rule 128(9) of the Rules does not provide for disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit (FTC) in case of delay in filing Form 67
DCIT Vs Maahi Milk Producer Co. Ltd (ITAT Rajkot) The brief facts of the case the assessee is engaged in the business of selling milk and milk products. The assessee had made payment of Rs. 29,63,90,780/- to M/s. Mother Dairy and M/s. Giriraj Milk Pvt. Ltd. for conversion of raw milk into processed milk and […]
Assessee claimed deduction u/s. 10B of Income Tax Act in its return of income instead of section 10AA. This can be a human error while preparing E-return.
There is no provision under the head Profits and Gains from business or profession which deems the rental income from unsold flats held as stock as Business income.
ITAT Surat held that there is no specific provision in the Income Tax Act that non-deciding the registration application under Section 12AA within a period of six months there shall be a deemed registration.
ITAT Delhi held that typographical error is to be rectified by filing a rectification application under section 154 of the Income Tax Act and not by preferring an appeal.
ITAT Chandigarh held that as tax finally assessed would be equal to the tax deducted at source and hence there is no basis for levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that interest on loan in respect of leased portion of the building is eligible for deduction u/s 24 of the Income Tax Act and accordingly cannot be allowed as work-in-progress.
ITAT Chennai held that amount of royalty payment to holding company for using brand name is allowable as revenue expenditure.
ITAT Kolkata held that liabilities which are incurred as trading liabilities with corresponding purchases cannot be subject matter of addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.