The appeal in the case of Simple Singh vs. ITO was directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, for the assessment year 2011-12
Agasthya Auto Products LLP filed an appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2011-12. The appeal raised multiple grounds, challenging the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
ITAT Kolkata orders reassessment of Mohammed Meraj’s case due to the lack of substantiating evidence regarding a mismatch in Form 26AS and Profit & Loss Account in TDS deduction.
The ITAT Delhi dismissed an appeal by Yogender Kumar and confirmed the levied late filing fee for a delay in filing a TDS statement, reinforcing the importance of timely compliance with TDS provisions.
The ITAT Chandigarh directs reassessment in a case where the appellant, Puran Singh, was unaware of a notice due to its delivery on his counsel’s e-mail ID, leading to the inability to provide explanations on cash deposits.
Overview and analysis of the ITAT Bangalore’s decision to direct re-adjudication due to the assessee’s unfamiliarity with the ITBA portal in the Krishnan Sivaprasad vs ITO case.
ITAT Mumbai held that capital gain tax inadvertently paid by the wife needs to be refunded with interest and the same needs to be recovered from the assessee as the same transaction cannot be charged to tax twice.
Explore the critical decision in Souvik Mukherjee Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) regarding taxation of a bonus received abroad, and how it impacts Foreign Tax Credit regulations.
ITAT Kolkata held that once the jurisdiction of the assessee is transferred from Delhi to Kolkata, every action for all the assessment year lies with ITO, Kolkata. Accordingly, notice issued u/s 148 by ITO, New Delhi is bad and illegal.
ITAT Mumbai held that penalty under section 272A(1)(c) not warranted as reasonable cause shown for delay in providing the details by the assessee and later in the end, the assessee had shared all the relevant details.
