Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shrikant Ghanshyam Shah Vs Int Tax Ward (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 296/MUM/2023
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/07/2023
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shrikant Ghanshyam Shah Vs Int Tax Ward (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that capital gain tax inadvertently paid by the wife needs to be refunded with interest and the same needs to be recovered from the assessee as the same transaction cannot be charged to tax twice.

Facts- AO received information from Income Tax Officer that assessee has sold two immovable properties during the year under consideration amounting to ₹.1,33,40,000/- and ₹.2,32,18,150/-. He observed that assessee has offered capital gain tax on transaction of ₹.2,32,18,150/- but did not offered the transactions of ₹.1,33,40,000/- in his return of income. Accordingly, he issued notice u/s.148 of Income-tax Act, 1961.

Assessee had stated that due to some error while submitting the return of income, one of the property sold by the assessee has been declared in his wife return and all the relevant taxes were paid in her account.

AO rejected the submissions made by the assessee and proceeded to make the addition in the hand of the assessee and accordingly, passed the draft Assessment Order u/s. 144C(1) of the Act. DRP sustained the addition. Being aggrieved, the present appeal is filed by the assessee.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031