Case Law Details
Yogender Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Introduction: In the case of Yogender Kumar Vs ITO, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi, upheld the decision to impose a late filing fee on the assessee for a delay in filing the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) statement. The assessee had purchased an immovable property and while the TDS was deducted and deposited as required, the filing of the TDS statement was delayed, resulting in a late filing fee.
Analysis: The case centers on the consequences of a delayed filing of the TDS statement, under Section 234E of the Income-tax Act, 1961. In this instance, the assessee faced a significant fee of Rs. 1,59,200. This appeal has reaffirmed the importance of timely compliance with the Act’s provisions. The tribunal also pointed out that the assessee was absent on multiple occasions during the proceedings and that their representations were mainly for adjournments.
This case also brings to light the ramifications of amendments made under Section 200A, effective from June 1, 2015. The ruling stressed that these changes allow the fee under Section 234E to be computed at the time of return processing and allow the issuance of an intimation specifying the same, payable by the deductor.
Conclusion: The tribunal’s dismissal of the assessee’s appeal serves as a stark reminder of the responsibility to comply with the Income Tax Act’s TDS provisions and the consequences of non-compliance. It underscores the importance of timely filing and the potentially high cost of failure to do so. It also reinforces the legal and procedural ramifications of amendments made under Section 200A and the implications of these for TDS provisions. The judgment confirms that the charges applied were in line with the established law and precedent.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
