ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition towards unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the Income Tax Act rightly deleted by CIT(A) as documentary evidences proving identity, creditworthiness of the parties and genuineness of the transaction were not proved to be defective by revenue.
ITAT Pune restored the matter back to the file of AO for examining the claim of Foreign Tax Credit of the assessee vis-à-vis furnishing of the Certificate or Statement as per Rule 128(8)(ii) along with Form No. 67.
ITAT Mumbai decision in Hari Mittar Yadav vs. ITO: Confirmation of addition on LTCG under Section 50C based on unregistered deeds entered on judicial stamp papers.
Genxt Mobile LLP wins appeal as ITAT deletes disallowance on interest payment, citing failure to compare with the fair market value under Section 40A(2)(a).
Property renovation cannot be disallowed merely for the reason that no telephone number, VAT/TIN number has been mentioned in the bill and there is no charges of VAT levied in the bill
ITAT Delhi rules in favor of Narendra Kumar Gupta, stating that books of account and vouchers are not required in a 44AD return, deleting additions u/s 69A.
ITAT Delhi’s decision in the case of Grand Venezia Commercial Towers Pvt. Ltd. regarding hearings notice sent to wrong address. Detailed analysis and conclusion.
ITAT Delhi rules in favor of a Canadian resident, allowing them to benefit from the India-Canada Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA). Learn more in this article.
DCIT vs. Dhani Services Ltd.: ITAT Mumbai upholds the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, along with ESOP expenditure.
DDIT vs. Linklaters (ITAT Mumbai): In cases where certain income qualifies for deduction, interest under Section 234B of the Income Tax Act is not applicable.