Payments made as part of a settlement agreement regarding relinquishment of partnership interests are capital expenditures ITAT Pune in ITO Vs Sarsan Developers
In Completed/Unabated Assessments, AO Cannot Make Additions in Absence of Incriminating Material Found during Section 132 or 132A Search
In the Prompt Barter Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO case, ITAT Kolkata directs AO to remove the income tax addition due to non-consideration of evidences for identity and creditworthiness of investors.
ITAT Delhi restores a matter to CIT(E) for re-adjudication after rejecting a charitable trust’s 80G exemption due to their failure to respond to issued notices. Analysis of the case.
Read about the ITAT Delhi’s direction to submit sales tax documents within 6 months. Analysis of the case between Jay Polychem India Ltd and ACIT.
Read the full text of the ITAT Delhi order on the case of AAA Teleshopping Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT for assessment year 2011-12, with detailed analysis and conclusions.
ITAT that as long as the charges for hourly services provided by appellant were uniform to AEs and third parties, rejection of CUP method was unwarranted.
ITAT Delhi’s decision in the case of Sumaitri Bima Distributors Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO regarding non-applicability of S.40(a)(ia) for TDS on salary before AY 2015-16.
Read the full text of the ITAT Mumbai order in Kailash Judhistir Sahu vs. CIT, where the addition from 12.5% to 6% for inability to produce parties of bogus purchases is restricted.
Addition under Section 153A could not be made in the absence of incriminating material found during the course of a search conducted under Section 132. In case no incriminating material was unearthed during the search, AO could not reassess taking into consideration the other material in respect of completed assessments/unabated assessments.
