ITAT Delhi held that expense towards management and marketing support service paid to foreign company is not taxable under Fee for Technical Service (FTS) under India-Netherlands Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) and hence TDS not deductible u/s. 195 of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that the expenses excluded from the export turnover have to be excluded from the total turnover as well while computing deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Guwahati held that the exemption of 10(26) of the Income Tax Act is available to the individual members of the Scheduled Tribe and that this benefit cannot be extended to a firm which has been recognized as a separate assessable person under the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Mumbai held that as there is complete uniformity in not charging interest from AEs and Non-AEs for delay in realization of export proceeds, addition of notional interest in respect of transactions with AEs in the course of transfer pricing proceedings unwarranted.
ITAT Delhi held that the reopening of assessment had been initiated by mere surmise and conjecture without having any cogent material to form a reasonable belief that income of the assessee had escaped assessment within the meaning of section 147 of the Income Tax Act.
In Adil Rehman’s case, ITAT Hyderabad allows expenditure on special power of attorney, air tickets, hotel stays, etc., as deductible in computing capital gains under Section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act.
Discover the ITAT Delhi ruling on taxing income from providing business support services to Indian group entities. Analysis of Solvay Asia vs. DCIT case under India-Thailand DTAA.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Bangalore’s decision in Jayanti Vasishta vs ITO allowing indexed cost of construction for a penthouse regularized on the sale date.
Explore the case of Dharani Developers Private Limited Vs ACIT, addressing whether fees paid to Registrar of Companies for enhancing working capital should be treated as revenue or capital expenditure.
In DCIT Vs Eko Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd., ITAT Kolkata rules that Section 2(22) of Income Tax Act doesn’t apply to non-beneficiary shareholders in loan-receiving companies.
