Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Adil Rehman Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 15/Hyd/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/03/2024
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Adil Rehman Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

In a recent decision by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Hyderabad, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the taxpayer, allowing various expenses incurred in connection with the transfer of property to be deducted against capital gains. The case, titled Adil Rehman Vs Income Tax Officer (ITO), pertained to the assessment year 2014-15 and revolved around the allowability of certain expenses claimed by the taxpayer while computing capital gains from the sale of immovable property during the financial year 2013-14.

Background of the Case: The taxpayer, Adil Rehman, had incurred expenses totaling Rs. 2,81,425, which included costs for obtaining a special power of attorney from the Indian Consulate in the USA, air tickets, hotel accommodations, postal charges, conveyance charges, lawyer fees, and photocopying expenses. These expenses were claimed by the taxpayer as necessary expenditures directly related to the execution of the property sale.

Assessment and Objections: Upon assessment, the Assessing Officer allowed only a portion of the claimed expenses amounting to Rs. 46,000, disallowing the remaining Rs. 2,35,425. The taxpayer objected to this decision before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), asserting that all the expenses incurred in connection with the property transfer should be considered allowable expenditures. The taxpayer relied on the precedent set by the Bombay High Court in the case of CIT vs. Shakuntala Kantilal (1991) 190 ITR 56 (BOM) to support their argument.

Decision of the ITAT: After careful consideration of the arguments presented by both the taxpayer and the Revenue, the ITAT ruled in favor of the taxpayer. The Tribunal emphasized that the expression ‘in connection with such transfer’ under section 48(i) of the Income Tax Act is broader in scope than ‘for transfer.’ It held that any expenditure necessary to effect the transfer should be considered an allowable deduction under section 48(i) of the Act.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031