Bombay HC in Hindustan Export & Import Corporation Private Limited Vs DCIT held that sharing newspaper cuttings alone did not meet criteria for sharing commercial expertise under Section 80-0 of Income Tax Act, 1961.
Learn about the Allahabad High Court’s ruling in Mid Town Associates Vs Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal) regarding penalty proceedings for non-production of E-way bill. Discover why mens rea is crucial in tax evasion cases.
Delhi High Court restores an appeal on the CESTAT Board despite a 9-day pre-deposit delay. Full text of the judgment and its implications discussed.
Whether addition made by Assessing Officer under Section 68 was justified, particularly in light of non-response from directors to notices.
Arrest Is A Serious Matter And Cannot Be Made Routine Manner On Mere Allegation of CGST Act violations: Bombay HC in Mahesh Gala vs Union of India & Ors in Criminal Writ Petition No. 938 of 2024
In landmark case of Nandan Auto Tech Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Excise, Punjab and Haryana High Court clarifies that penalty under Rule 25 Central Excise Act requires mens rea.
Orissa High Court rules on appeal rights of BPD Steel Syndicate Pvt. Ltd. in a case concerning non-constitution of an Arbitral Tribunal. Detailed analysis provided.
Read the detailed analysis of Baisany Ramiah Chetty Pandurangan Vs Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) judgment from Madras HC. Learn why GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and income tax documents were deemed insufficient to establish Goods Transport Services under RCM.
Read the full judgment/order of Madras High Court quashing an I-T assessment order adding Rs. 16Cr unexplained expenditure without reasonable time. Portal reopening ordered.
Madras High Court sets aside a tax demand order, citing lack of opportunity. Petitioner contests ITC claim on commercial vehicle purchase. Read full judgment here.
