Delhi HC ruled that PCIT’s rejection of an application under Section 119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act lacked reasoning. Court remanded matter for fresh consideration.
Delhi High Court held that the documents which were seized during the course of search does was unsigned Agreement to sell (ATS) which does not contain name of assessee, the said material cannot be said to pertain/pertains to assessee.
Court observed that no notice was issued under Section 41-A of Code of Criminal Procedure before arrest. Analyzing complaint, court found prima facie evidence insufficient to establish Section 420 offences, warranting bail.
Court emphasized that if no input tax credit was available in the ledger, the rule did not permit insertion of a negative balance; instead, only blocking of the electronic credit ledger was permissible.
Learn how the Jharkhand High Court ruled on interest for late GST returns, why liability disputes matter, and the impact on East India Udyog Ltd.
Merely because the Directors of the two companies were common may have given rise to suspicion that the deposits received by the assessee company from the other, was bogus.
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Gautam Ship Breaking Ind. Ltd. (Gujarat HC): Interest not chargeable on Amount of MODVAT credit, which was lying unutilized and which has been ordered to be reversed
Delhi High Court dismisses appeal of VI Exports India Pvt. Ltd. for export of banned non-basmati white rice due to non-compliance with notification conditions.
Madras High Court quashes demand in computation sheet and notice, ruling no additions proposed in income tax assessment order.
Madras High Court dismisses writ petition challenging revision order under Section 263 of IT Act, directing pursuit of statutory appeal.
