Allahabad High Court rules that without intent to evade tax, penalties under Section 129(3) of UP GST Act are unsustainable. Prahlad Rai Vijay Kumar case.
Allahabad HC imposes heavy costs & disciplinary action on GST officers for not providing personal hearings. NS Agro and Engineering Products Vs State of U.P.
Powers of Section 127 could be invoked for public interest and administrative convenience and the ground of coordinated investigation was a good ground of transfer.
Learn about the dismissal of Best Recharge appeal regarding interest payment on excess Input Tax Credit. Details of the case and court ruling explained.
In a case before the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the absence of the authority’s signature on the order leads to its nullification. Detailed analysis here.
Explore detailed analysis of case between G.R.R. Associates and Andhra Pradesh VAT Appellate Tribunal regarding service of notice in compliance with Rule 64 of A.P.VAT Rules, 2005.
Varsha Foods Products India Pvt Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner (ST): Andhra Pradesh High Court rules GST on Mango Pulp at 12%, citing a government circular.
Detailed analysis of the Rajasthan High Court judgment on whether crane services provided constitute a sale under Section 2(35)(iv) of the RVAT Act-2003. Key arguments, contract analysis, and legal implications discussed.
Allahabad High Court rules that a godown search and seizure cannot lead to penalty under Section 129(3) of UP GST Act. Read detailed judgment.
Explore Section 153A of Income Tax Act, its implications, and judicial interpretations. Learn about search proceedings, panchnama, and assessment challenges.
