Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prahlad Rai Vijay Kumar Vs State of U.P. And 2 Others (Allahabad High Court)
Appeal Number : Writ Tax No. 587 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : Writ Tax No. 587 of 2022
Related Assessment Year : 16/05/2024
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Prahlad Rai Vijay Kumar Vs State of U.P. And 2 Others (Allahabad High Court)

In the case of Prahlad Rai Vijay Kumar vs. State of U.P. (WRIT TAX No. 587 of 2022), the Allahabad High Court held that, in the absence of an intention to evade tax, the penalty order is liable to be quashed.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, a taxable person, issued a tax invoice and an e-way bill for the supply made. Both documents were accompanying the vehicle carrying the goods. The vehicle was intercepted for verification, and the goods were found to be in order and matched the invoices and e-way bill. However, the e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to the interception. The delay in transportation was due to the vehicle breaking down. This explanation was not considered by the authorities, and a penalty under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’), was imposed.

Court’s Findings and Conclusion

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031