Kerala High Court held that lessee is liable to deduct TDS u/s. 194-I of the Income Tax Act, however, there is a dispute for ownership of the property. Then, in such case lessee is directed to deduct TDS and deposit under his TAN as unclaimed challan.
Notably, the original authority recorded that it is evident that the details provided at the time of migration from the registration under the VAT to GST were false and the registration of the petitioner is therefore liable to be cancelled.
Bombay HC rules that limitation for filing appeal under MGST Act begins from the email communication date of the assessment order, April 20, 2019.
Kerala HC ruled that GST appeal limitation starts when orders are uploaded on the GST portal. Appeals filed manually must be accepted in transition cases.
Rajasthan HC rules Section 179 of the IT Act doesn’t apply to public limited companies, quashing notices against the director. (160 characters)
Madras High Court quashes GST orders denying Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to retrospective amendment in Section 16 of CGST Act. Relief granted to taxpayers.
Madras High Court allows GST pre-deposit adjustment via the Electronic Credit Ledger for appeals, clarifying legal provisions under TNGST Act.
The High Court does not, therefore, act as a court of appeal against the decision of a court or tribunal to correct errors of fact and does not, by assuming jurisdiction under Article 226, trench upon an alternative remedy provided by statute for obtaining relief.
The respondents issued a show cause notice u/s. 28 and 124 of the Customs Act alleging a shortage of stock of diamonds imported after taking into account the exports effected, resulting evasion in customs duty to substantial extent.
The present appeal is filed by the revenue. Notably, the respondent is a Custom Broker. It was alleged that certain exports facilitated by the respondent which were made by the exporters, who are allegedly found to be non-existent at their principal place of business.
