Madras High Court ruled that the validity of service of notice is a factual question best addressed by the appropriate appellate authority rather than under writ jurisdiction.
Bombay High Court orders inquiry into lost GST documents in Sheshnath Adyaprasad Singh’s case, seeking action against responsible officers.
Delhi High Court rules that CBIC is not required to clarify GST on Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS), directing taxpayers to rely on statutory provisions.
Gauhati High Court stays GST notice against Bhagya Kalita, questioning jurisdiction under Section 74(1) of the CGST Act. Case to be heard on 09/12/2024.
In the abovementioned matter HC observed that all three conditions mentioned in section 220 (2A) were not co-existed and hence writ petition is liable to be dismissed.
In the recent ruling Hon’ble HC have observed that penalty proceedings, initiated u/s 271 D is barred by delay & laches as period of limitation starts from the reference made by ITO to Addl. CIT.
Bombay High Court quashes CBDT order denying delay condonation for Bharat Education Society, citing procedural lapses and lack of personal hearing.
Bombay HC ruled on Anandkumar Dhanraj Rathod’s tax case, addressing natural justice claims and directing him to appeal the assessment order under IT Act.
Bombay HC quashes order by Additional CIT, emphasizing CBDT or its members must explicitly issue orders under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Limitation period for Section 271DA penalty should be counted from the date of the assessment order and delay in making the reference could not extend the limitation period
