Madras High Court sets aside IT assessment orders for Vetrivel Minerals citing lack of incriminating evidence and breach of natural justice principles.
Gujarat High Court examines the procedure for faceless income tax assessment and the assessee’s right to a personal hearing via video conference under Section 144B.
Bombay High Court dismisses appeals by Refrigerated Distributors, upholding ITAT’s 10% addition on unproved purchases for assessment years 2007-08 to 2012-13, citing concurrent findings of fact.
Calcutta High Court addresses ITAT’s role in Sec 263 orders for fresh assessments and the eligibility for enhanced vehicle depreciation for own business use.
Gujarat HC rules in CIT vs Mitesh Impex that new tax deduction claims (80IB/80HHC) can be made at appeal stage without a revised return, distinguishing Goetze.
Madras High Court held that advocates shall maintain professional integrity and do not engage in acts that could mislead the public or undermine the legal profession. Court ordered detailed enquiry regarding a fake law firm operated by a non-advocate.
It is submitted that if the rectification as sought for is allowed, the petitioner would be entitled to a refund of 74,61,65,427/- for the period between July 2017 to November 2017.
Delhi High Court held that section 153C of the Income Tax Act doesn’t required AO to find or uncover a relationship or an association between the searched and the non-searched person.
Delhi High Court held that once addition on the basis of which reasons recorded for reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act has been deleted, then, other addition made are not sustainable in law. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
Delhi High Court held that matters having financial liabilities or penal consequences cannot be kept unresolved for years. Thus, show cause notice issued in 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2018 adjudicated vide order issued in 2024 is liable to be quashed.
