Patna High Court sets aside GST demand due to violations in inspection and tampering of official documents by a tax officer.
Jharkhand HC quashes demand on GST transitional credit by Steel Authority of India, restoring Rs 30.29 Cr. to the petitioner in a case of VAT credit transition.
Bombay High Court held that initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act resulting into change of opinion and review of the assessment order is not permissible in law. Accordingly, reassessment proceedings are liable to be quashed.
Gujarat High Court sets aside ITAT’s order, criticising the casual remand of a tax evasion case despite the assessee’s non-compliance.
Gujarat High Court rules B Nanji & Co. can claim interest deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) for borrowed funds used in business expansion via share acquisition.
Punjab & Haryana High Court rules in Rakesh Gupta Vs CIT that tangible information on client code modification justifies income tax re-assessment.
Allahabad High Court quashes GST orders against Raksha Enterprises for violation of Section 75(7) and Section 75(6) of GST Act, remands case for rehearing.
Delhi High Court held that repeated placing and removing from the call book is not valid justification for non-adjudication of show cause notice for more than 10 years. Accordingly, order passed after 10 years is not sustainable and liable to be quashed.
Anup Kumar Singh Vs Union of India & others (Calcutta High Court) Calcutta High Court held that issuance of provisional seizure order under Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 [FEMA] is in complete disregard of the moratorium prescribed by section 33(5) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code [IBC] since the provisions of the IBC would override the […]
Anil Kumar Singh Vs Union of India (Patna High Court) Patna High Court held that not obtaining registration under service tax alone cannot be reason to believe that there is existence of fraud or wilful suppression with intent to evade payment of service tax. Thus, extended period of limitation not applicable. Facts- The petitioner is […]
