Delhi High Court held that technical glitch with wording in the stamp ‘signature not verified’ doesn’t render order invalid as order was uploaded on GST portal which can be done only after verification by concerned State Tax Officer.
Bombay High Court dismissed income tax appeals by the CIT against Agastmuni Construction, citing CBDT Circular No. 17/2019’s monetary limits.
Karnataka High Court allows appeal for Premalatha Pagaria, condoning 350-day delay, citing ‘sufficient cause’ and auditor’s oversight.
Bombay High Court grants interim stay on GST levy for assignment of MIDC leasehold rights, aligning with a recent Gujarat High Court precedent.
Gujarat High Court sets aside GST demand on transfer of leasehold rights in industrial plot by Time Technoplast to its subsidiary, citing previous judgments.
Rajasthan High Court grants bail to Ankit Jain in a GST fraud case, citing Supreme Court precedents, filed charge-sheet, and the nature of evidence.
Subsequently, the petitioner submitted a representation/application dated 05.09.2024 and 24.10.2024 seeking the respondents for the refund of the adjust amount along with interest for which the petitioner neither received a reply nor the refund.
Delhi High Court held that prior approval u/s. 151 for issuance of notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act beyond period of three years mandatory even in case of extended limitation under TOLA. Accordingly, notice and order thereon set aside.
Delhi High Court held that penalty imposed under section 276B of the Income Tax Act is liable to be set aside on account of section 278AA of the Income Tax Act as reasonable cause shown. Accordingly, petition by revenue dismissed.
The fact that the AO had in fact did not claim any carry forward of loss in the next assessment year would not be destructive of the petitioner’s right to exercise its option in terms of Rule 9(1) of the DTVSV Rules. Hence, the present petition is allowed.
