Himachal Pradesh High Court held that accused is rightly convicted of the commission of an offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act since it is duly proved that accused has failed to pay money to the complainant.
Gauhati High Court held that non-communication of ‘reasons to believe’ to the arrestee in the matter of fraudulent availment of ITC under GST vitiates the process and undermines the safeguards guaranteed under law, rendering the arrest procedurally infirm. Accordingly, interim bail granted.
Delhi High Court held that bail application dismissed as there are reasonable grounds to believe that the accusations in money laundering case against the Appellant appear prima facie to be true. Accordingly, bail application rejected.
Karnataka High Court rules clerical errors in tax invoices, without intent to evade tax, do not justify confiscation of goods under Section 130 of the CGST Act.
Gujarat HC rules penalty on expired e-way bill for zero-rated export is invalid as no tax is payable, quashing the 200% penalty order under Section 129.
Himachal Pradesh High Court sets aside recovery notice against Hindustan Construction Company, directing the Assistant Commissioner to conduct a fresh assessment for the 2017-18 GST dispute by September 30, 2025.
Court had conditionally remanded an income tax assessment order after the petitioner was unable to opt for a personal hearing due to a technical glitch in the e-filing portal. Denial of a hearing due to system failure constituted a violation of the principles of natural justice.
Madras High Court held that prosecution initiated for the offence punishable under Section 276C(1) of the Act cannot be continued, in the light of the penalty proceedings initiated under Section 276C(1) of the Act have been already terminated by the Appellate Tribunal.
Himachal Pradesh High Court held that complainant failed to prove his financial capability and hence the accused is entitled to acquittal. Accordingly, order of Trial Court upheld and petition is dismissed.
Madras High Court directs to furnish fresh reply regarding compliance of defects stated in order rejecting application in e-form NDH-4 filed by Nidhi Company. Further, department directed to pass order after considering fresh replies and after providing opportunity of being heard.
