Under Section 153C, the six-year limitation period for issuing a notice to a person other than the one searched begins from the date on which the documents or materials were received by AO, not from the date of the search or notice.
Cancellation of GST registration due to assessee’s failure to file returns on time would be revoked in case of genuine medical reasons and assessee’s willingness to pay tax and interest without adjusting from unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC).
Writ petition filed in connection with the misuse of a Goods and Services Tax Identification Number (GSTIN) was dismissed as assessee could not claim to be completely innocent for sharing OTP with an accountant which was allegedly misused to create multiple fake firms.
In Jakir Husain’s case, the Delhi High Court referred a dispute over seized gold bars to mediation. The court determined the issue was not with the Customs Department, but rather between the petitioner and his lawyer who had possession of the gold.
Madras High Court directed Commissioner of Customs to consider a refund request from Ravi International Exports for a rs 3,07,999 security deposit from an auction.
In a case pending since 2009, Court held trial court wrongly allowed fresh plea at argument stage; clarified plaintiff may argue contentions before final decision.
In the case of LRS and Co., the Madras High Court ruled that a GST demand order (DRC-01D) must be quashed once the full dues are paid. The court ordered the State Tax Officer to pass a new order for proper appropriation and refund any excess payment.
The Delhi High Court has granted an extension for an arbitral tribunal’s mandate, even after the 12-month period expired, citing a Supreme Court precedent and a pending corporate insolvency case.
When there were 650 noticees, obviously, the generation of DRC-07 for each of the noticees could take some reasonable time so long as the order had been communicated through e-mail or post or other modes as contained in Section 169 of the CGST Act.
The Delhi High Court has transferred a winding-up petition against Madhusudan Auto Limited to the NCLT, aligning with a Supreme Court ruling on jurisdiction.
