Follow Us:

All High Courts

Under Rule 22 (2) of the Anti-Dumping Rules and the proviso thereto, the initiation of a new shipper review cannot be with retrospective effect in the case of a first time exporter.

May 14, 2008 714 Views 0 comment Print

H and R Johnson (India) Limited,Versus Union of India – Under the given circumstances of the case and particularly the purport of Rule 22 (2) of the Anti-Dumping Rules and the proviso thereto, the initiation of a new shipper review cannot be with retrospective effect in the case of a first time exporter.

Entry Tax-Petitioner who had discharged his burden by producing the bills which had no rubber seal to the effect “local goods for the area”, cannot be held liable to pay the tax in the absence of any proof to the contrary

April 28, 2008 1119 Views 0 comment Print

Explore the legal case of M/s Goel Coal Co. vs. State of Madhya Pradesh regarding entry tax. Understand the significance of rubber seal on invoices and how the absence of such seal affects the liability of the petitioner. Read the High Court of Madhya Pradesh’s order dated 7/3/2008, highlighting key legal points. Get insights into the burden of proof, implications of the Ranomal case, and the petitioner’s entitlement to the prima facie import of the absence of a rubber stamp. Stay informed about the intricacies of entry tax laws in this comprehensive legal analysis.

PF, ESI paid after 31st March but before filing of return is allowable

April 9, 2008 2084 Views 0 comment Print

The grievance of the revenue is that proviso appended to section 43B of the Act permitting allowing of deduction of PF, ESI etc., subsequent to the close of the accounting period but before the return is filed, should not have been followed but disallowance must be upheld. It has not been disputed before us that the proviso has been inserted by the Finance Act, 1987 effective from 1.4.1988. In view of this, the appeals preferred by the revenue have been dismissed.

Payment by cable operator to get licence of TV channels is covered u/s 194C

March 3, 2008 6605 Views 0 comment Print

The assessee is a cable network operator through which it provides telecasting of programmes to the ultimate consumers/subscribers. The assessee in turn enters into a contract with the licensor of various TV channels. On the payment so made, Section 194C of the Act is attracted.

Gratuity payment under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 or otherwise exempt to the extent covered under the Income Tax Act

February 25, 2008 4185 Views 0 comment Print

No doubt, section 192 of the Income-tax Act requires the employer to deduct the income-tax from the salary and the salary is defined under section 17 of the Income-tax Act, which includes wages, any annuity or pension, any gratuity, any fees, commissions, perquisites or profits in lieu of or in addition to any salary or wages, any advance of salary and other payments

Requirement of clubbing of turnover for the purpose of section 44AB in case assessee is carrying on more than one business

February 22, 2008 1857 Views 0 comment Print

Tribunal has also placed reliance on yet another judgment of the Supreme Court. ported in (1972) ITR 83 page 27 (Hindustan Steel Limited Vs State of Orissa), where it dealt with the provisions contained in Orissal Sales Tax Act. While considering the general principles, the Apex Court has held that penalty can be levied on failure of the assessee

Whether sale proceeds of plants raised in nursery on land belonging to assessee consti­tutes income from agriculture – Held, yes

February 15, 2008 2154 Views 0 comment Print

Section 2(1A) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 – Agricultural income Assessment years 1988-89 and 1990-91- Whether sale proceeds of plants raised in nursery on land belonging to assessee consti­tutes income from agriculture – Held, yes . Commissioner of Income-tax, Meerut v. Green Gold Tree Farmers (P.) Ltd.

Employer’s Obligation-TDS-Previous Employment’s payments

February 15, 2008 3281 Views 0 comment Print

CIT v. Marubeni India (P.) Ltd. In case where the present employer did not include salary paid by the previous employer u/s 192(2), because previous employer did not provide the details of disbursement, issue arose whether such present employer is liable for penal interest. It was held by HC that the liability of the present employer is limited only to the extent of details furnished by the employee with reference to his previous employment. In other words the present employer’s obligation of TDS will be restricted to the disbursements made by himself and also on the income earned in a previous employment if such details are furnished to him by the employee.

It cannot be said that AO has not applied his mind when all material was placed by Assessee before him

February 13, 2008 1290 Views 0 comment Print

In our view, once all the material was before the AO and he chose not to deal with the several contentions raised by the petitioner in his final assessment order, it cannot be said that he had not applied his mind when all material was placed by the petitioner before him.

Rohitasava Chand Versus Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi High Court)

February 9, 2008 903 Views 0 comment Print

There is no doubt that the non-compete agreement incorporates a restrictive covenant on the right of the Assessee to carry on his activity of development of software. It may not alter the structure of his activity, in the sense that he could carry on the same activity in an organization in which he had a small stake, but it certainly impairs the carrying on of his activity. To that extent it is a loss of a source of income for him and it is of an enduring nature, as contrasted with a transitory or ephemeral loss.

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031