Bombay High Court ruling favors Tata Steel, allowing its Rs. 212.52 crores contribution to Compensatory Afforestation Fund as revenue expenditure, dismissing IT department’s appeal.
CESTAT Kolkata allows benefit of Notification No.25/1999-Cus as amended by Notification No.26/2002-Cus, which exempts Basic Customs Duty on imported Zinc Oxide which has been used in manufacture of PCFP.
Surinder Kumar Garg vs Union of India Revenue Secretary – Detailed analysis of Delhi High Court judgment setting aside GST order denying Input Tax Credit (ITC) claim.
Balu Jayaraman vs Assistant Commissioner (ST): Madras HC permits filing of statutory appeal challenging penalty imposition after full GST and interest liability discharge.
Dive into the case of Hindustan Aeronautics Limited vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) regarding service tax demands. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
Read the full text of the judgment/order of Orissa High Court in the case of Surjit Kumar Dhal vs State of Odisha (EOW). Senior journalist accused of duping Rs.1 crore for approvals.
Explore the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on Bright Performance Nutrition’s IGST dispute with customs. Detailed analysis of classification and IGST rate implications.
Analysis of Nano Hospitals Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Customs case by CESTAT Hyderabad, stating imported medical devices with 5+ years life aren’t hazardous waste.
The court set aside the impugned order, granting the petitioner another opportunity. The petitioner agreed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand for all heads except turnover reconciliation and differences between the GSTR 3B return and Form 26AS. For these two specific heads, the petitioner is willing to remit 5% of the disputed tax demand.
Kerala High Court ruling deems notice demanding late fees on GSTR-9C filed pre-GST Amnesty Scheme unjust. Full text analysis provided.
