Bombay High Court held that once SVLDRS-2 issued and follow up action taken by the department, authorities cannot renege on the same when rejection of SVLDRS-1 not communicated to the applicant.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that freight charges for delivering goods to the buyers premises is not includible while assessing the value for the purpose of payment of central excise duty.
Madras High Court held that petitioner duly provided detailed reasons as to why they were unable to file the duty drawback claim within the prescribed time, whereas, impugned order was passed without stating reasons for rejecting the claim. Such impugned order being a cryptic and non-speaking is liable to be quashed.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that mixing of thermol and the input namely Mixed oil does not alter the nature of the product accordingly the same doesnt amount to manufacture.
ITAT Surat held that bill and vouchers of the expenditure claimed by the assessee was loss on account of floods. The explanation of expenses by way of copy of accounts, names and addresses, details TDS deducted and payments by crossed account payee cheques acceptable.
ITAT Chandigarh held that addition of mere book entry unsustainable as no amount has been received and no adverse interference with regard to the same has been drawn by the department.
ITAT Mumbai held that compensation received on account of non-performance of obligation by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) is capital receipt not taxable in the hands of the assessee.
Gujarat High Court held that as per CBIC circular dated 23.02.2021 provisionally attached movable property (including bank account) should be released when the taxable person offers any immovable property in lieu of the same.
ITAT Delhi held that levy of surcharge and cess cannot exceed the tax rate of 10% as per India – Japan DTAA. Accordingly, as per article 12 of India – Japan tax treaty the tax to be charged on royalty and FTS shall not exceed 10% of the gross amount of royalty or FTS.
ITAT Hyderabad held that mere securing a house on rent in the USA is not the conclusive fact that the assessee had become a USA resident to allow DTAA benefit.
