NCLT Amravati held that the approach of the creditor in filing the proof of due service of the demand notice straightway before Adjudicating Authority, without placing the same before the resolution professional, is improper.
n Legal Initiative For Forest And Environment (LIFE Trust) Vs PCIT (ITAT Delhi), the stay application was denied as the test for irreparable loss was not met.
In Topaz Service Corporation Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Delhi), it was ruled that Erection, Commissioning and Installation Services should only tax pure service contracts, excluding composite contracts with goods.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that merely making a claim that is not sustainable does not amount to furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Accordingly, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act not justified.
Bombay High Court held that amount paid towards community services and social welfare under Memorandum of Settlement under the Industrial Dispute Act is allowable as business expenditure.
ITAT Chennai held that construction of new dwelling unit on first floor is eligible for deduction under section 54F of the Income Tax Act as construction was done within stipulated time limit.
Sri Avantika Contractors (I) Limited. Vs Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (GST) and others. (Telangana High Court) Telangana High Court held that consideration received towards ‘works contract service of construction’ which was completely executed outside the territory of India is outside the purview of GST. Accordingly, GST not leviable. Facts- The Government of India (GoI) […]
ITAT Ahmedabad held that the AO must record a proper satisfaction regarding the incorrectness of the assessee’s claim before invoking Rule 8D u/s. 14A. Thus, in absence of such satisfaction, disallowance u/s. 14A of the Income Tax Act unsustainable.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that passing of ex-parte order by CIT(A) without adjudicating issues on merits, such order is not sustainable in the eyes of law keeping in view provisions of Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act.
ITAT Kolkata held that additions u/s. 153A of the Income Tax Act could only be made on the basis of seized material found during the course of search. Thus, making additions in regular assessment without any incriminating material relating to said addition not justified.
