Calcutta High Court dismissed the review penalty as imposition of penalty for non-updation of Part-B of e-way bill rightly reduced to INR 50,000/- due to non-disclosure of cogent reasons.
Karnataka High Court held that passing of order on information procured from Stock Exchange and banks without furnishing the information to petitioner for their explanation is violative of principles of natural justice and hence set aside.
Madras High Court held that cancellation of GST registration due to non-payment of GST due to the financial crisis faced by the petitioner restored as the same will motivate the petitioner to do his business and pay pending tax.
Madras High Court held that the Assessment Officer has not recorded the reasons for arriving at a subjective satisfaction to initiate penalty proceedings under Section 271E of the Act, which is mandatory. Thus, order set aside.
Allahabad High Court held that second attachment of bank account under section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act without providing fresh reasons is illegal, arbitrary and non est in law. Accordingly, provisional attachment order quashed.
Delhi High Court held that cancellation of GST registration with retrospective effect without providing any intelligible reason for cancellation is unsustainable. Accordingly, impugned cancellation order is void.
Madras High Court held that under the guise of investigation, order freezing the entire account without quantifying the amount and period cannot be passed. Such order will be construed as violation of the fundamental rights of trade and business.
Delhi High Court held that that there was no justification for the respondents to issue notices afresh seeking to reopen the proceedings which had been concluded prior to the judgment passed in Ashish Agarwal.
ITAT Chennai held that no findings have been rendered on various documentary evidences furnished by the assessee. Accordingly, matter restored in view of violation of the principle of natural justice.
Rajasthan High Court held that addition on account of bogus accommodation entries merely based on admission of assessee in absence of any corroborative evidence unjustified. Thus, addition held as unsustainable.
