ITAT Agra held that dismissal of appeal as per provisions of section 249(4)(b) for non-payment of advance tax unjustified since entre addition made by AO was challenged and there was no other income which is above threshold limit of being taxable.
NCLAT Delhi held that held that considering the text of Section 60(5)(c) of IBC liquidators can ask for the refund of the Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG) amount, which was given by the Corporate Debtor towards margin money for securing a PBG.
The case was selected for limited scrutiny through CASS. AO observed that the assessee had also from other sources and also from agricultural activities carried out during the year
NCLAT Chennai held that application for staying auction process of Corporate Debtor not tenable since order rejecting resolution plan submitted by the appellant not objected. Accordingly, appeal dismissed.
Allahabad High Court held that no substantial question of law arise since Tribunal after thorough scrutiny concluded that invocation of revisionary proceedings u/s. 263 by PCIT was without any base. Thus, appeal filed by revenue dismissed.
NCLT Bengaluru held that once the Resolution Plan is approved, no claim that is not a part of the Resolution Plan can exist or continue. Thus, changes in the resolution plan post adjudication of arbitration proceedings not tenable.
Delhi High Court held that TDS under section 194C of the Income Tax Act not deductible on capital grant subsidy extended by NHAI to the Concessionaire since it cannot be construed as payment made for a work undertaken by the contractor.
This application has been filed by the suspended director of M/s. Manjeera Retail Holdings Private Limited (MRHPL), which, along with its holding company, Manjeera Constructions Limited (MCL), is undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
Telangana High Court held that second vehicle tax under the provisions of Telangana Motor Vehicles Taxation Act doesn’t apply since old vehicle was sold prior to permanent registration of new vehicle purchased.
As per Indian Customs Declaration Form of the petitioner, there were no dutiable goods carried by him. Petitioner had not declared any gold/bullion in Column No. 10 (ii) & (iii) in the declaration form.
