Karnataka High Court held that Gram Panchayat has no jurisdiction to impose property tax on properties situated within a notified industrial area governed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 [KIAD Act]. Accordingly, writ petition is allowed.
ITAT Nagpur held that co-operative society is eligible to claim deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act in respect of interest earned from credit facilities extended to nominal members. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
Madras High Court held that reassessment proceedings under section 148 of the Income Tax Act initiated on the basis of change of opinion is invalid. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed and substantial questions of law is answered in favour of assessee.
ITAT Jaipur held that reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act issued by the Assessing Officer [AO], having no jurisdiction, is invalid. Accordingly, assessment order and consequent proceeding are also invalid.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that provisions of section 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the Income Tax Act gets applicable as source of undisclosed income admitted during the course of survey not explained. Merely disclosing and paying tax doesn’t protect assessee from clutches of section 69A.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition by adopting Percentage Completion Method cannot be sustained as department already accepted Project Completion Method in earlier years. Accordingly, appeal allowed and addition set aside.
Gujarat High Court held that interest from co-operative bank is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act as Cooperative bank is a Cooperative society registered under the Gujarat State Cooperative Societies Act. Accordingly, appeal of revenue dismissed.
These appeals filed by the assessee impugn the order dated 30.04.2021 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, allowing the petitions that were filed by the Commissioner of Wealth Tax and Commissioner of Income Tax, viz., respondent No.1 herein.
Pune Zilha Madhyawarti Sahakari Vs PCIT (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune held that revisionary order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act is liable to be quashed as AO conducted detailed enquiry and after proper application of mind has taken one of the view legally permissible and concluded the assessment. Accordingly, appeal allowed. Facts- The […]
Madras High Court remanded the matter back to Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal [DRAT] since it has merely affirmed the order of Debt Recovery Tribunal [DRT] and has not appreciated/ re-appreciated evidence independently while determining nature of land i.e. whether it is agricultural or otherwise.
