CESTAT Delhi held that since imported helicopter is used for private purpose without any remuneration earned from such flights, there is no substantial compliance of Condition No. 104 of Exemption Notification no. 61 of 2017 dated 03.05.2007. Accordingly, confiscation of helicopter upheld.
Kerala High Court held that importer mis-declared semi-dried dates imported by them as fresh dates hence IGST exemption wrongly claimed. Further, importer approached to amend bill of entry only after initiation of proceedings under section 28, accordingly, amendment is not permissible.
ITAT Mumbai held that balancing figure between the slump sale consideration and the value of identifiable tangible assets represents goodwill or commercial rights in the nature of an intangible asset, and depreciation thereon is allowable under section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that CENVAT Credit in respect of input / input services used for construction of building which itself is to be used in the provision of output service of Renting of Immovable Property is admissible. Accordingly, order is set aside and appeal is allowed.
Calcutta High Court held that Bending and Bundling services cannot be claimed under the heading Clearing and Forwarding Services. Accordingly, demand of service tax under tax bracket of Clearing and Forwarding services to that extent quashed.
Madras High Court held that affiliation fee collected by the Universities does not fall within exemption hence such fees collected by the University from the Colleges as affiliation fees is amenable for levy of GST.
ITAT Chennai held that disallowance in terms of section 14A of the Income Tax Act read with rule 8D restricted to the extent of investment which yielded exempt income. Accordingly, disallowance restricted and appeal partly allowed.
Karnataka High Court held that refund of accumulated Input Tax Credit in case where the input and output tax are the same is allowed. Accordingly, order is liable to be set aside and refund claim deserved to be allowed.
ITAT Mumbai held that transfer pricing addition made in respect of Letter of Comfort rightly deleted since Letter of Comfort didn’t constitute an International Transaction. Accordingly, order passed by CIT(A) upheld to that extent.
ITAT Mumbai held that disallowance made under section 14A of the Income Tax Act added to Book Profits for computing taxes under section 115JB Income Tax Act deserved to be deleted.
