Madras High Court, in the case of Annamalai Bus Transports P Ltd. vs PCIT, has directed the CIT (Appeals) to expedite the appeal filed by the assessee within 60 days. The court noted procedural irregularities and the violation of principles of natural justice in the penalty proceedings, emphasizing the absence of cash transactions.
Madras High Court, in the case of Anamallais Bus Transports P Ltd vs. PCIT, has prima facie set aside penalty proceedings under Section 271-E of the Income Tax Act. This article explores the court’s view, emphasizing no cash transactions and directing the Appellate Authority to review the appeal without pre-deposit.
Explore the Madras High Court’s decision to set aside an assessment order in the case of Shopping Zone India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax. Analysis of the violation of natural justice and its implications.
Explore the Madras High Court’s directive to revive the tax appeal in Palanisamy Jeevanantham Vs PCIT case. Analysis of the order and its implications on assessment proceedings.
Madras High Court addresses penalty proceedings in Annamalai Bus Transports vs. PCIT for AY 2018-19. No cash transaction, emphasizes fair assessment.
Madras High Court clarifies charge priority in City Union Bank vs. Tax Recovery Officer case. First charge holder’s dues have precedence over tax recovery.
This HC directs CIT (A) to consider Appellant’s grounds & pass Order on merits: read our blog post to learn more about this Madras High Court judgment!
Explore the detailed analysis of Antony Alphonse Kevin Alphonse vs ITO case at Madras High Court. Uncover the assessment challenges, legal proceedings, and the court’s decision.
Explore the legal saga of a petitioner seeking de-sealing of property in Salem. Uncover the missteps in liquidation, tax checks, and the plea for justice.
Madras High Court remits a case back to the authorities, asking them to review a delay in filing a tax application under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act.
