Under Section 10(1) of the DVAT Act, 2004, where any purchaser has been issued with a credit note or debit note in terms of section 51 of this Act or if he returns or rejects goods purchased, as a consequence of which the tax credit claimed by him in any tax period in respect of which the purchase of goods relates
CS Ankur Garg Through this write up we shall discuss another topic which is quite frequent for secretarial department of a Company. Statutory provisions related to transfer of share one should refer the following sources: 1. Section 56 of Companies Act, 2013 2. Rule 11 of Companies (Share Capital & Debentures) Rules 2014 3. Provisions […]
RBI allowed for repayment of rupee loans by availing of ECB in certain sectors and also permitted refinancing of existing ECB by raising fresh ECB at lower all-in-cost but subject to the condition that outstanding maturity of the original loan is not reduced. Some of them are enlisted hereunder:
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee had sold her immovable property being residential flat No.101, 1st floor, Hill Queen, Pali Malla Road, Bandra, Mumbai for Rs. 1,55,00,000/- on 30.08.2006 and after indexation Long Term Capitasl Gains( LTCG) of Rs.1,26,20,624/- were determined.
ITAT held in its order that ICAI CPE programmes might have failed to achieve the desired objectives with some of the Chartered Accountants. It further said that it is hightime that the ICAI should take note of these practicalities and should take corrective steps in order to maintain/restore the high standards and quality expected from a C.A. professional.
The extension of date for obtaining and submitting the Tax Audit Report till 30th November 2014 for the Assessment Year 2014-15 without extending the due date to file the Return of Income has created many concerns in the minds of Chartered Accountants.
Reliance in this regard can be placed on the decision of Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in case of M/s Vinay Wire and Poly Product Private Limited Vs. DGCEx [Writ Tax No. 283 of 2014] wherein the appellant has challenged the order of Hon’ble Settlement Commission passed u/s 32E of CEA, 1944.
Attention is invited to this Department’s O.M. of even number dated 10th October, 2013 wherein the authorised travel agents namely M/s Balmer Lawrie & Company Limited (BLCL), M/s Ashok Travels & Tours (ATT) and Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC), were allowed to levy ‘Facilitation Fee’ @ Rs. 100/- per ticket for domestic sector and Rs. 300/- per ticket for international sector for air travel, wherein Government of India bears the cost of air passage.
Notification No. 42/2014-Income Tax S.O. (E).- Whereas, an Agreement between the Government of the Republic of India and the Royal Government of Bhutan for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes on income was signed in India on the 4th day of March, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement)
Commissioner Vs. Maruti Fabrics [(2014) 47 taxmann.com 298 (Gujarat)] In the instant case, Maruti Fabrics (the Assessee) clandestinely removed certain goods. Thereafter, the Assessee filed an application before the Settlement Commission (the SC) admitting the clandestine removal of goods. The SC sent back the case to the Adjudicating authority who relied upon the Assessee’s admission […]
