Follow Us:

‘High Speed Diesel Oil’ includible as commodity in CST registration certificate

October 9, 2020 2553 Views 0 comment Print

Sri Siva Saravana Blue Metals Vs  Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Madras High Court) The Appellant State and the Revenue Authorities are directed not to restrict the use of ‘C’ Forms for the inter-State purchases of six commodities by the Respondent/Assessees and other registered Dealers at concessional rate of tax and they are further directed to permit […]

Pure consultancy services to Municipalities & Corporations are exempt from GST

October 9, 2020 7377 Views 0 comment Print

In re Vimos Technocrats Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Q1. Whether pure consultancy services provided to the Municipalities and Corporations are exempt from GST as per the serial number 3 of the notification 12/2017-Central tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017? A1. Pure consultancy services (without supply of goods) provided by the applicant to the Municipalities and Corporations […]

Notification No. 54/2020-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) dated 09.10.2020

October 9, 2020 534 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 54/2020-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) dated 09.10.2020- Appointment of Common Adjudicating Authority by Pr. DGRI. Government of India Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Notification No. 54/2020-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI) New Delhi, dated the 09.10.2020 S.O. 3627(E). – In pursuance of notification No. 60/2015-Customs (N.T.), published vide […]

GST on Liaison office in India of Foreign Company

October 8, 2020 8427 Views 0 comment Print

Whether the Activities of a liaison office amount to supply of services, Whether a liaison office is required to be registered under CGST Act, 2017 and Whether liaison office is liable to pay GST?

Section 11 exemption cannot be withdrawn merely for profit from certain incidental or ancillary activities of the trust

October 7, 2020 1902 Views 0 comment Print

JCIT(OSD), (Exemptions) Vs Patiala Improvement Trust (ITAT Chandigarh) The AO noticed that during the year relevant to the assessment year under consideration the assessee carried on the business of sale and purchase of residential plots and commercial properties and earned huge net profit of Rs. 9,95,74,223/-, which does not fall within the ambit of the […]

​Names of valuers as per Order u/s 34AD of Wealth Tax Act, 1957

October 6, 2020 8838 Views 0 comment Print

Order u/s 34AD of the Wealth Tax Act. 1957 In exercise of the powers conferred on the Chief Commissioner or Director General of Income Tax under section 34AD of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957, I, the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-03, Delhi hereby having regard to the conditions prescribed in Section 34AD of the W.T.Act, 1957, remove the names of the below mentioned registered valuers from the Register of Valuers maintained in the 0/o Pr.CCIT, Delhi with immediate effect:

Advance Ruling Authority -MVAT

October 6, 2020 1770 Views 0 comment Print

Commissioner of State Tax, Maharashtra State, hereby constitute the Advance Ruling Authority, comprising the following members : Shri Govind Vasantrao Bilolikar (CST-APP-F-002)

No Service Tax on amount collected towards bouncing of cheque charges

October 5, 2020 2118 Views 0 comment Print

Rohan Motors Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) The demand of service tax in respect of the amount collected on account of bouncing of cheques and cancellation of orders is also not sustainable. These amount are penal in nature and not towards consideration for any service. In this connection reliance can be placed […]

Goods & Vehicle cannot be ordered to release as confiscation proceedings is pending: HC

October 5, 2020 1626 Views 0 comment Print

Rajesh Kiran D Vs. Joint Commissioner Of State Tax (Gujarat High Court) The matter, as on date, is at the stage of Form GST MOV-10. Thus, the writ applicant has been called upon to show-cause as to why the goods and the vehicle should not be confiscated under Section 130 of the Act. The writ […]

Section 271AAB penalty notice defective if it not specify the default

September 30, 2020 11463 Views 0 comment Print

Rashmi Jalan Vs ACIT (ITAT Kolkata) Penalty notice issued under section 274 read with section 271AAB  is bad in law as the showcause notice issued by the Assessing Officer does not specify the charge/s against the assessee for levy of penalty, as required by law. Thus, on this ground, the penalty is quashed. Even otherwise, […]

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031