The Arbitrator is the final arbiter of the disputes between the parties and it is not open to a party to challenge the Award on the ground that he has drawn his own conclusions or has failed to appreciate certain facts.
Employees’ State Insurance Corporation Vs Union of India (Supreme Court of India) Facts- The ESIC has filed the present appeal against the judgement of Division Bench which rejected the petition filed against the promotion of the contesting respondent to the post of ‘Associate Professor’ under the Dynamic Assured Career Progression Scheme (DACP Scheme). Fact of […]
Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. Vs Antrix Corporation Ltd. (Supreme Court of India) Facts- The company, Devas Multimedia Pvt. Ltd., in liquidation has challenged an order of winding up passed by the National Company Law Tribunal under section 271(c) of Companies Act, 2013. The order was confirmed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. It is contended […]
Van Buren Vs United States (Supreme Court of United States) Facts- The main issue involved is unauthorized access of computer under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 86 by a police sergeant. As alleged, the police sergeant used his patrol-car computer to access a law enforcement database to retrieve information about a particular license plate […]
This Court is of the considered opinion that changing mode of instruction to English or imparting education in English per-se is not violative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the children or to their parents under Article 21A of the Constitution of India. Because Article 21A only assures right of a child below 14 years to have access to free and compulsory education, whereas the manner has been left at the discretion of the State to be determined by law.
MRF Limited Vs Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) (Madras High Court) Facts- The main allegation is that when natural rubber price increased, the tyre prices were increased in a concerted manner by the domestic major tyre manufacturers, however, when the price of natural rubber decreased, the tyre prices were not reduced by the domestic major […]
Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (RMGB) and Anr. Vs Ramesh Chandra Meena & Anr. (Supreme Court of India) Facts- While working as Branch Manager, it was alleged that he committed irregularities while granting loans to farmers/ villagers under loan scheme. He didn’t take adequate precautions and without writing mandates of borrowers, he transferred the loan amount in […]
Krishna Kishore Singh Vs Sarla A. Saraogi (Delhi High Court) Facts- In the present case, plaintiff (Sushant’s Singh family) questioned the court to examine the right to privacy of Sushant’s family to prevent the defendants from publishing film on Sushant’s life when the other side contended that the right to privacy of a celebrity extinguishes […]
Mohan Thakur Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Facts- As per the report, information was received from the Australian taxation office that the Assessee under consideration has transferred funds amounting to 12,97,122 AU (Australian Dollars) to many of his relatives through hawala system for the period of F.Y. 2007-08 to 2012-13. Shri. Shagun Thakur (son) has claimed […]
Revenue preferred an appeal against ITAT order which hold that open terrace area which can be accessed only through the private balcony of the individual purchaser should not be included while computing the built-up area for the purpose of claiming deduction u/s 80IB(10).
